<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Roger Federer vs Andy Roddick &#8212; Wimbledon 2009 Final</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fuzzyyellowballs.com/roger-federer-vs-andy-roddick-wimbledon-2009-final/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fuzzyyellowballs.com/roger-federer-vs-andy-roddick-wimbledon-2009-final/</link>
	<description>Learn how to play tennis for FREE. Video tennis lessons in High Definition.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 00:18:33 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Byunggun</title>
		<link>http://www.fuzzyyellowballs.com/roger-federer-vs-andy-roddick-wimbledon-2009-final/comment-page-4/#comment-7542</link>
		<dc:creator>Byunggun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 16:23:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fuzzyyellowballs.com/?p=2600#comment-7542</guid>
		<description>Im guessing roddick&#039;s forehand was not that comsistant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Im guessing roddick&#39;s forehand was not that comsistant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chadley Uekman</title>
		<link>http://www.fuzzyyellowballs.com/roger-federer-vs-andy-roddick-wimbledon-2009-final/comment-page-4/#comment-6451</link>
		<dc:creator>Chadley Uekman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 17:21:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fuzzyyellowballs.com/?p=2600#comment-6451</guid>
		<description>I would have to say the one shot that hurt Andy was his approcach shots particularly on the backhand side.  He was not effective enough with the approach slice on many occasions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would have to say the one shot that hurt Andy was his approcach shots particularly on the backhand side.  He was not effective enough with the approach slice on many occasions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard</title>
		<link>http://www.fuzzyyellowballs.com/roger-federer-vs-andy-roddick-wimbledon-2009-final/comment-page-4/#comment-6013</link>
		<dc:creator>richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 22:34:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fuzzyyellowballs.com/?p=2600#comment-6013</guid>
		<description>it was the backhand slice</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it was the backhand slice</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Villacres</title>
		<link>http://www.fuzzyyellowballs.com/roger-federer-vs-andy-roddick-wimbledon-2009-final/comment-page-4/#comment-2661</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Villacres</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 02:33:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fuzzyyellowballs.com/?p=2600#comment-2661</guid>
		<description>Good question...Roddick played like a winner overall but I think his down the line forehand might have been off. It could have been used as a serious weapon to finish a point, or at let set up a winner, but his wrist was a little bit closed and didn&#039;t open up that down the line as much as he could have. When he DID, he actually was moving Federer all over the court like I&#039;ve never seen Andy do. So I would say: down the line forehand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good question&#8230;Roddick played like a winner overall but I think his down the line forehand might have been off. It could have been used as a serious weapon to finish a point, or at let set up a winner, but his wrist was a little bit closed and didn&#8217;t open up that down the line as much as he could have. When he DID, he actually was moving Federer all over the court like I&#8217;ve never seen Andy do. So I would say: down the line forehand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gyu Hii</title>
		<link>http://www.fuzzyyellowballs.com/roger-federer-vs-andy-roddick-wimbledon-2009-final/comment-page-4/#comment-2637</link>
		<dc:creator>Gyu Hii</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 13:48:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fuzzyyellowballs.com/?p=2600#comment-2637</guid>
		<description>That´s ridicilous. Federer deserved to win. He were more peaceful than Roddick...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That´s ridicilous. Federer deserved to win. He were more peaceful than Roddick&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eric</title>
		<link>http://www.fuzzyyellowballs.com/roger-federer-vs-andy-roddick-wimbledon-2009-final/comment-page-4/#comment-2056</link>
		<dc:creator>eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 07:40:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fuzzyyellowballs.com/?p=2600#comment-2056</guid>
		<description>that is absoloutely right thats what i thought too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that is absoloutely right thats what i thought too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bobby L Y Kok</title>
		<link>http://www.fuzzyyellowballs.com/roger-federer-vs-andy-roddick-wimbledon-2009-final/comment-page-4/#comment-2053</link>
		<dc:creator>Bobby L Y Kok</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 05:29:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fuzzyyellowballs.com/?p=2600#comment-2053</guid>
		<description>Best analysis of the match I have read so far.
Thanks for that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Best analysis of the match I have read so far.<br />
Thanks for that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr Quebec</title>
		<link>http://www.fuzzyyellowballs.com/roger-federer-vs-andy-roddick-wimbledon-2009-final/comment-page-4/#comment-1936</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr Quebec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 18:56:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fuzzyyellowballs.com/?p=2600#comment-1936</guid>
		<description>Roddick certainly struggled with Federer&#039;s serve, but who wouldn&#039;t?

This day, I remember Roger painting lines in both boxed like I&#039;ve never seen him do. I mean he was really sharp and never followed any predicatble pattern.

But, you seem to act like it&#039;s all Roddick&#039;s fault. You have to consider many of his peers consider Federer has being the hardest server to read on the tour. Kickers, slices, topspin, twists, flat on lines and corners... All that he never changes much his swing. The ball is always at the same spot, he always goes the same... Like he doesn&#039;t even change his motion at all. When you can notice what have changed, it&#039;s already too late because you have to face an incoming ball. Never tips his opponent. This makes it tremendously hard to play. All you can do is keep guessing and watch the ball.

You said Roddick serve is better than Federer&#039;s. I would hardly conceid Federer&#039;s sevre as being lesser good. On grass and clay, Roddick&#039;s power is merely effective. Speed is useful up to a certain extend and you can read the statistics; on grass and clay, effects and angles prime over power. Get through the numbers and see if you can get percentage of winning points off first and second serves if the ball is returned.

Compare Roddick and Federer and tell me who prepares the play better.

Yes Roddick had problem reading Federer&#039;s serve. Off Federer&#039;s own mouth, he says he sometimes sees all what Roddick is about to serve and sometimes not. If he cannot read it, the game is harder.

If Roddick didn&#039;t played Federer well on his serve, Federer was even worst on Roddick&#039;s. Aces tell me how accurate and disguised the shots were. Rallies won off first serves and second serves tells me how well you used it.

Both players were unable to read each other and were both serving really well. It happened Roddick didn&#039;t adjusted anything and lost, but he yet won two games off Federer&#039;s serve while Federer got only one out at the very end.

It tells me the game could have been lesser close on each side, but yet the game played is now history and Federer was the one able to get the important poitn off. Like he always did and always do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roddick certainly struggled with Federer&#8217;s serve, but who wouldn&#8217;t?</p>
<p>This day, I remember Roger painting lines in both boxed like I&#8217;ve never seen him do. I mean he was really sharp and never followed any predicatble pattern.</p>
<p>But, you seem to act like it&#8217;s all Roddick&#8217;s fault. You have to consider many of his peers consider Federer has being the hardest server to read on the tour. Kickers, slices, topspin, twists, flat on lines and corners&#8230; All that he never changes much his swing. The ball is always at the same spot, he always goes the same&#8230; Like he doesn&#8217;t even change his motion at all. When you can notice what have changed, it&#8217;s already too late because you have to face an incoming ball. Never tips his opponent. This makes it tremendously hard to play. All you can do is keep guessing and watch the ball.</p>
<p>You said Roddick serve is better than Federer&#8217;s. I would hardly conceid Federer&#8217;s sevre as being lesser good. On grass and clay, Roddick&#8217;s power is merely effective. Speed is useful up to a certain extend and you can read the statistics; on grass and clay, effects and angles prime over power. Get through the numbers and see if you can get percentage of winning points off first and second serves if the ball is returned.</p>
<p>Compare Roddick and Federer and tell me who prepares the play better.</p>
<p>Yes Roddick had problem reading Federer&#8217;s serve. Off Federer&#8217;s own mouth, he says he sometimes sees all what Roddick is about to serve and sometimes not. If he cannot read it, the game is harder.</p>
<p>If Roddick didn&#8217;t played Federer well on his serve, Federer was even worst on Roddick&#8217;s. Aces tell me how accurate and disguised the shots were. Rallies won off first serves and second serves tells me how well you used it.</p>
<p>Both players were unable to read each other and were both serving really well. It happened Roddick didn&#8217;t adjusted anything and lost, but he yet won two games off Federer&#8217;s serve while Federer got only one out at the very end.</p>
<p>It tells me the game could have been lesser close on each side, but yet the game played is now history and Federer was the one able to get the important poitn off. Like he always did and always do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RH</title>
		<link>http://www.fuzzyyellowballs.com/roger-federer-vs-andy-roddick-wimbledon-2009-final/comment-page-4/#comment-1884</link>
		<dc:creator>RH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 17:49:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fuzzyyellowballs.com/?p=2600#comment-1884</guid>
		<description>Spot on, Austin, FYB touched on it too in the analysis of Federer&#039;s service strategy against Roddick, in the final.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spot on, Austin, FYB touched on it too in the analysis of Federer&#8217;s service strategy against Roddick, in the final.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil Abraham</title>
		<link>http://www.fuzzyyellowballs.com/roger-federer-vs-andy-roddick-wimbledon-2009-final/comment-page-4/#comment-1812</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil Abraham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 21:21:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fuzzyyellowballs.com/?p=2600#comment-1812</guid>
		<description>Once again, great video Will (and everyone else involved in making FYB vids!). Been watching for some time now and I can&#039;t thank FYB enough for your insightful, interesting and high quality vids. Keep up the great work!

Anyways, before I watch the answer, I&#039;m going to say Roddick&#039;s backhand slice. Been a while since I watched the match but I recall him netting that shot often. It was almost as though, despite his improved movement, he wasn&#039;t positioning himself well enough to hit the slice properly. 

I would say return of serve also but I can&#039;t remember any specific occassions where it was really hurting him/where he gave away unforced errors and Roddick&#039;s return was never his strength anyway...

May be about to be proved wrong though...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once again, great video Will (and everyone else involved in making FYB vids!). Been watching for some time now and I can&#8217;t thank FYB enough for your insightful, interesting and high quality vids. Keep up the great work!</p>
<p>Anyways, before I watch the answer, I&#8217;m going to say Roddick&#8217;s backhand slice. Been a while since I watched the match but I recall him netting that shot often. It was almost as though, despite his improved movement, he wasn&#8217;t positioning himself well enough to hit the slice properly. </p>
<p>I would say return of serve also but I can&#8217;t remember any specific occassions where it was really hurting him/where he gave away unforced errors and Roddick&#8217;s return was never his strength anyway&#8230;</p>
<p>May be about to be proved wrong though&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
